The economic importance of brands: why brands matter

by | 2 Sep, 2025 | The Brands Blog

The economic importance of brands – seven reasons why brands matter (more than ever) in the age of AI and beyond

In 2004, we first explored the economic importance of brands[1], arguing that they were often misunderstood yet vital to consumers, companies, and markets. In 2017, amid digital disruption and the big data revolution, we revisited these ideas, emphasizing brands as measurable assets that protect consumers and fuel competition[2].

In 2025, as AI changes how personalization works and global uncertainties test resilience, it seems like the right moment to revisit the “seven reasons why brands matter.”

Strong brands still provide reliability and quality, but they now face their biggest shift yet: carrying human values and identity into the marketplace. With artificial general intelligence (AGI) and super AI (SAI) on the horizon, brands are set to evolve from market signals into vital infrastructure that help protect human values and people’s ability to make their own choices.

1.   Strong brands protect the consumer

Strong brands act as a shield for consumers: they simplify choices, reduce search costs, and signal consistent quality and ethics. Recent survey evidence shows that a large share of consumers will quickly abandon brands that fail to meet expectations, proof that credibility and relevance are primary defences against information overload[3]. Classic guidance like Keller’s ‘Brand Report Card’ still applies: clear positioning, consistency, and trustworthy communications are foundational to perceived quality and risk reduction[4]. In 2025, these defences are augmented by AI, from personalized discovery to better service coordination, yet they also require stronger guardrails against manipulation. Research shows that algorithms can quietly take decision-making power away from people; strong, authentic brands help protect their ability to choose and make it easier to see when an offer is truly right for them[5]. Practitioners echo this: authenticity is emerging as a last durable differentiator in AI‑saturated markets[6].

2.   Strong brands drive share performance

Financial markets repeatedly validate the value‑creating role of brands. Kantar’s 2025 BrandZ ranking estimates the Top‑100 global brands at roughly $10.7 trillion in aggregate value, with leaders like Apple maintaining outsized brand equity that correlates with superior cash‑flow resilience and pricing power[7]. Brand Finance’s global studies show similar patterns across categories, where brand strength aligns with durable earnings and lower investor risk[8]. In the AI transition, brands act as stabilizers. By building loyalty and creating meaning, they add a buffer of “useful slack” into fast-moving, efficiency-driven systems. This cushions companies against short-term shocks and gives them the confidence to invest for the long term[9].

3.   Brands ensure a competitive economy

Brands make competition clear. They stand out not just by price, but also by origin, features, service, sustainability, and cultural fit — driving better quality and innovation. Nation‑brand analysis underscores the macro effect: in 2025, the United States’ nation brand strength was closely tied to its ability to innovate and attract investment[10].

At company level, distinctive brand assets (fonts, colours, characters, packs and sound cues) help consumers recognize and choose among alternatives, keeping markets contestable rather than commoditized[11,12]. Looking forward, as AI tends to homogenize offers, brands function as ‘resistance networks’ that preserve cultural variety and keep competitive plurality alive[13].

4.   Brands help the economy to adapt and grow

As reputation compounds over time, strong brands are structurally incentivized to invest in R&D, design, and service improvements. Cross‑industry valuation data shows that brand‑intensive categories produce outsized cash‑flow durability and expansion options during disruption[14]. AI expands these options: computer vision and recognition accelerate product discovery and asset testing; content automation enables mass personalization; and localised creative allows global brands to operate ‘glocally’ at scale[15,16]. Strategic scholarship and practice point to an evolution in brand eras, from identity and awareness, through data‑driven engagement, to co‑creation with customers and communities, each stage deepening adaptability[16]. Looking ahead, brands can also serve as ‘translation protocols’ that render human preferences and ethical constraints legible to advanced AI systems, ensuring adaptation does not come at the expense of human values[17,18].

​5.   Brands help businesses cross geographic and cultural borders

Brands project soft power. Nation‑brand strength aligns with export potential and talent attraction; Brand Finance’s 2025 study highlights the continued importance of credible, innovative country images for trade and investment flows[10]. On the company side, modular brand architectures enable companies to localize responsibly. Amazon’s portfolio logic, for example, uses sub‑brands and tiers to address distinct missions and regions without diluting the parent promise[19]. AI tools (translation, search, and image recognition) make such localization faster and cheaper while helping brands respect local aesthetics and norms[20]. In this sense, brands are cultural bridges that allow economic globalization without cultural erasure[21].

6.   Strong brands benefit all stakeholders

The value of the stakeholder approach is now quantifiable. PA Consulting reports that consumers reward brands perceived as honest, human‑centred, and innovative, with significant willingness to pay and higher share of wallet for those delivering superior experiences[3]. Internally, strong brands attract and retain talent by clarifying purpose and standards; externally, they coordinate partners through shared language and assets. Co‑creation platforms like LEGO Ideas show how community participation can extend innovation pipelines beyond the firm boundary[22]. As branding moves toward co-creation and stewardship, creating value for stakeholders becomes a requirement, not just a side effect[23].

7.   Brands ensure businesses are accountable for their actions

As brand equity is observable and valued, it makes firms answerable. ISO 10668 (the international standard for brand valuation) codifies valuation principles that link financial worth to transparent inputs (cash flows, market data, and consumer‑based measures)[24]. In parallel, always‑on analytics and social listening increase the speed at which inconsistencies between stated purpose and behaviour are surfaced[25]. Classic accountability criteria – credibility, integrity, responsiveness – remain central to brand strength[7]. In AI‑intensive markets, brands also become mechanisms of economic expression: even when prices converge, people can signal norms and priorities through attention and affiliation, nudging firms toward responsible conduct[8,9].

Conclusion – brands as essential (soft) infrastructure

Across the seven reasons – consumer protection, superior performance, competitive vitality, adaptive growth, cross-border reach, stakeholder benefit, and accountability – the economic case for brands remains robust and is still expanding. But the strategic case now goes further. As AI systems take on more tasks and automate more decisions[17], brands function as essential infrastructure, ensuring human values, trust, and cultural variety remain embedded in economic life. They help safeguard people’s freedom to make choices while keeping markets diverse and meaningful[18, 26]. For leaders, the mandate is clear: invest in brands not just as marketing tools, but as enduring assets that drive innovation, safeguard trust, and anchor economies in human needs and aspirations. In the age of AI, brands should be understood as essential (soft) infrastructure, the operating system that keeps markets human-centered.

Sources:

  1. British Brands Group, The economic importance of brands – seven reasons why brands really matter, by Clamor Gieske, FutureBrand, 2004.
  2. British Brands Group, The economic importance of brands – seven reasons why brands (still) really matter, by Clamor Gieske (Zeitgeist 365), 2017.
  3. PA Consulting, Brand Impact Index 2025 (report).
  4. Kevin Lane Keller, “The Brand Report Card,” Harvard Business Review, Jan–Feb 2000.
  5. MIT Sloan Management Review, “The Great Power Shift: How Intelligent Choice Architectures Rewrite Decision Rights,” January 2025.
  6. Studio Yellow, Branding in the AI Era: Why Authenticity Is the Ultimate Differentiator, February 16, 2025.
  7. Kantar, BrandZ Top 100 Most Valuable Global Brands 2025 (report).
  8. Brand Finance, Global 500 / Global Industry Valuations 2025 (report).
  9. The Economist, “The economics of superintelligence,” July 2025.
  10. Brand Finance, Nation Brands 2025 (report).
  11. Jenni Romaniuk, Building Distinctive Brand Assets, Oxford/ASI, 2018.
  12. D. White, “35 Types of Distinctive Brand Assets,” infographic/post, 2023.
  13. L. Brinkmann, I. Rahwan & J. Török, “Machine Culture: How Intelligent Machines Are Transforming Culture,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2311.11388, 2023, https://arxiv.org/abs/2311.11388.
  14. Y. Larkin, “Brand Perception, Cash Flow Stability, and Financial Policy,” Journal of Financial Economics, 110, no. 1 (2013): 232–253. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2013.07.006.
  15. M. Wedel & P. K. Kannan, “Marketing Analytics for Data-Rich Environments,” Journal of Marketing, 80, no. 6 (2016): 97–121.
  16. M. Wedel & L. M. De Luca, “Innovation and Marketing in the Age of AI,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 38, no. 3 (2021): 541–566.
  17. Sequoia Capital, The Always-On Economy: AI’s Real Impact in the Next 5–7 Years, April 21, 2025, https://www.sequoiacap.com/article/always-on-economy/.
  18. Silvio Savarese & Peter Schwartz, Artificial General Intelligence: Casting a Vision for a Better Future, Salesforce, January 18, 2024, https://www.salesforce.com/in/news/stories/what-is-artificial-general-intelligence.
  19. Remarkly Brand Strategy, Amazon’s Brand System Update, 2025.
  20. Brandnation. “Visual Recognition Technology & Personalization in Branding.” 2025.
  21. Arjun Appadurai, “Disjuncture and Difference in the Global Cultural Economy,” Theory, Culture & Society, 7, no. 2–3 (1990): 295–310. https://doi.org/10.1177/026327690007002017.
  22. LEGO Ideas, Community Co-Creation Platform Overview (website, accessed 2025), https://ideas.lego.com.
    S. Pearson & E. Malthouse, “Fifth Generation IMC: Expanding the Scope to Profit, People, and the Planet,” arXiv preprint arXiv:2404.04740, 2024.
  23. International Organization for Standardization, ISO 10668: Brand Valuation, 2010 (applied 2025).
  24. KPMG, Sustainable Growth in Branding (white paper), 2025.
  25. R. Raman, R. Kowalski, K. Achuthan, A. Iyer & P. Nedungadi, “Navigating Artificial General Intelligence Development: Societal, Technological, Ethical, and Brain-Inspired Pathways,” Scientific Reports, 15 (2025): 8443. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-025-92190-7.

Click here to email this to a friend, or share via using the social buttons below: